Skip to main content

Race is America’s deepest problem

RIOTS are rarely so widely anticipated. By 8pm on November 24th, when the prosecutor in Ferguson, Missouri, announced the grand jury’s decision not to charge a police officer with a crime for shooting an unarmed black teenager, Michael Brown, cops in riot gear were already in place and barriers surrounded municipal buildings. Mr Brown’s parents and Barack Obama called for calm. Yet soon America’s TV screens were full of burning police cars, crowds coughing on tear gas, and young black men throwing bricks and smashing shops. America’s history of racial injustice looked as potent as ever.
That would be the wrong conclusion to draw. Looking back at the riots in Los Angeles in 1992 that followed the acquittal of four white police officers who had savagely beaten a black motorist, Rodney King, a lot has changed. America has a black president. The LA riots, which left 53 dead, happened in one of America’s great cities, and sparked violence in others. This time the focus was a struggling suburb; in Los Angeles black teenagers protested peacefully alongside white ones.
Blacks plainly still suffer prejudice across America: they account for 86% of the vehicle stops made by police in Ferguson. But America’s race problem is increasingly one of class. Blacks’ biggest problem is now poverty, which is most visible in places such as Ferguson. Like many post-war suburbs across America, Ferguson is stuck between the prosperous white exurbs of St Louis and the city’s somewhat revitalised centre. In 1990 its population was three-quarters white; by 2010, it had become two-thirds black. The sub-prime mortgage crisis hit it hard. Many of its homeowners still owe more than they own.
Solving the problems of places like Ferguson is less about passing more anti-discrimination laws than about rekindling economic growth and spreading the proceeds. But there are also ways of making politics and policing work better that would contribute greatly to racial harmony in America.
The police are not an army
Ferguson’s political institutions have not kept up with its demography. Of the city’s six-member council, five are white. The hapless mayor, James Knowles, is a white Republican who was re-elected in 2013 in an election in which fewer than one in eight eligible voters turned out. He is in charge of the police force, in which three out of 53 officers are black. Such disparities feed the belief—held by blacks across the country—that both justice and law-enforcement systems are racist.
Police brutality reinforces that belief. If there was one lesson from the attack on Rodney King, it was that police officers should behave like civilians, not an occupying army. Around 500 people were killed last year by the police—though since nobody counts, nobody really knows.
In Ferguson, bad policies help to explain why distrust turns to anger. Take, for example, the way the town is financed. In 2013 a fifth of Ferguson’s general revenues—some $2.6m, in a city of 21,000 people—were derived from fines and asset confiscation. That is equivalent to $124 a year for every man, woman and child in the city. Paying fines, even for minor traffic offences, can involve queuing for hours. Those who miss court dates can be jailed until they pay, accumulating more fines along the way. Slowly but surely, the justice system has become an elaborate mechanism for criminalising poverty.
Smaller cities should stop using their police forces and courts as tax-collectors. Police shootings should be taken much more seriously, and the federal government should stop enabling small police forces to buy military-grade weapons. Proper gun control laws would help: policemen who fear they will be shot are more likely to kill suspects. In their absence, body-mounted cameras might constrain police behaviour.
Efforts should also be made to increase voter turnout. Ferguson, like many small cities, holds its municipal elections at odd times in odd-numbered years, when little else is on the ballot. If they coincided with national elections, more people would be paying attention. And attempts to restrict voting—by banning Sunday polls, restricting voting hours and requiring people to produce ID—should be resisted.


Popular posts from this blog

The Confederacy's Love Affair with Donald Trump: Unraveling the Historical, Cultural, and Political Factors

The love affair between certain segments of the Confederacy and Donald Trump , the 45th President of the United States , is a complex phenomenon that intertwines historical, cultural, and political factors. This blog aims to explore the reasons behind the affinity some individuals in former Confederate states developed for Trump , examining how his policies, rhetoric, and persona resonated with certain aspects of their identities. The legacy of the Confederacy and its Civil War history continues to influence some individuals in former Confederate states. For some, Trump 's " Make America Great Again " slogan might have stirred sentiments of nostalgia, harking back to an era they perceive as a time of greater prosperity and traditional values. This historical resonance could be seen as an appeal to a lost past, which Trump implicitly promised to restore during his campaign. The Confederacy' s love affair with Trump can be linked to cultural conservatism . Many resid

Is There A Relationship Between Donald Trump And White Supremacists?

The relationship between President Donald Trump and white supremacists has been a topic of considerable controversy and debate. During his tenure as the 45th President of the United States, Trump' s rhetoric and actions often sparked discussions about his association with white supremacis t groups and the extent to which he may have emboldened them. This blog aims to explore the complexities of this relationship, considering key incidents and statements that shed light on the matter. To understand Trump' s connection to white supremacists, we must first examine his rise to political prominence. During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump 's appeal was rooted in populism, voicing concerns shared by a portion of the American population regarding immigration, trade deals, and economic opportunities. However, some critics argue that elements of his rhetoric, such as the infamous "Muslim ban" proposal and his emphasis on border security, inadvertently resonated wit

Donald Trump Hates Obama And Obama's Legacy?

The political landscape in the United States witnessed a remarkable contrast between the presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump . The transition of power from Obama, a Democrat who symbolized hope and change, to Trump , a Republican who embraced an unconventional and divisive approach, highlighted stark differences in their policies, rhetoric, and leadership styles. Their relationship, shaped by mutual animosity and occasional civility, played a crucial role in shaping the nation's discourse during this period. The transition of power between Barack Obama and Donald Trump was marked by both cordiality and tension. Despite their contrasting political ideologies, President Obama upheld the tradition of a peaceful transition of power and extended a warm welcome to President-elect Trump . They met at the White House , discussing national security and other critical issues. However, behind closed doors, reports suggested that Obama warned Trump about the challenges of the